Big machine records artists7/28/2023 Swift can currently re-record all of her past albums with the exception of Reputation, as Reputation was released in 2017 and it has not been five years since the original release. Swift is legally able to re-record her masters after a number of years because of the re-recording clauses in her contracts with Big Machine Records. One question of debate has been if Swift is even entitled to re-record her masters. On April 9 th, 2021, Swift released her first re-recorded master album, Fearless ( Taylor’s Version). Now, in an effort to gain ownership of her past music, Swift has now been on a mission to re-record her master recordings. Just when Swift was about to release Lover, Ithaca Holdings LLC announced it sold Swift’s master recordings to Shamrock Holdings for around $300 million without Swift’s knowledge. Swift outwardly condemned this transaction, as she never was offered to purchase her master recordings, something she repeatedly asked Big Machine Records to consider. Just one year after Swift signed with her new record label, Big Machine Records was bought by Ithaca Holdings LLC for just over $300 million, with Swift’s discography accounting for an estimated $140 million of that. The agreement between the parties allows Swift to own all of the master recordings she makes from now on. After Swift’s Sixth studio album came out, Reputation, Swift and Big Machine Records were unable to come to a new deal and thus, Swift entered into a new contract with Republic Records and Universal Music Group. However, Swift was able to keep the copyright to her songs as long as she wrote the lyrics. When Swift was just fifteen years old, she signed a record deal with Big Machine Records which conveyed the ownership rights of the first six albums Swift produced to the label. Additionally, contracts between artists and record labels usually contain clauses that prohibit artists from re-recording their music until two to five years after the original release of the album or when the contract between the parties ends. While Swift is not the first artist to re-record her masters, she certainly is paving the way for future artists to be more assertive and demanding when making contracts with record labels in order to ensure artists have more say in their masters and maybe even fully own them as well. Typically, these contracts give the record labels ownership of the master recordings, along with the ability to control the manufacturing, distribution, and promotion of that recording. Artists, like Swift, tend to sign contracts with recording labels who turn the artists’ musical compositions into the master recordings, which are then copyrighted by the label. Why would Taylor Swift (“Swift”) be re-recording her past work? Well, the answer is simple. With the upcoming release of Taylor Swift’s re-recorded album Red ( Taylor’s Version), on November 19 th 2021, Swift fans are getting ready to experience this album all over again just nine years after the original release of the album.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |